Dear God, help me share the thoughts in me in a way that pleases You. Kindly bless me and the reader to get what is necessary for us to be in Your will and wish. Amen.
In this article, the word "love" means "the love of God", unless otherwise specifically indicated.
Love of God shall be the life of everything we do
Love of God means the presence and effect of God's love for us and in us. What it does not mean is the "human" view of our Love towards God. This is because God is Love (
1 John 4:8). This means we cannot generally and mostly say that we are Love. In other words, we will mostly end up being liars if we say that we are love. We could only be Love as much as God is in us. We cannot also forget the fact that He loved us first (
1 John 4:19). Our love is the reflection or the effect or the consequence of the Love that is loving us.
With these basic facts set, let us go to the interested objective. The main point to meditate here is this: "
because one loves, one does", not the other way around.
It is not very appropriate to say (or then to claim): "because one does/did certain things, one loves/loved". In other words, it is not very appropriate to say: "you know, because I did this and that, so I loved". It is not that it cannot be true. However, it would be better for one not to say or observe love in this manner. Let us then ask this question: why wouldn't or shouldn't I say so or think in this manner? The answer lies in answering or meditating on the following question: Why would I want to say in this manner in the first place (like - since I did this and that, and so I loved)?
Taking our love for our family as an example, if we have to say something, which we can avoid saying most of the times, it is more appropriate to say or think:
it is because I love my family, I (am happy to) do the things that I do. However, doesn't it sound inappropriate to you, if I rather say: it is because I go to work, earn and support, I love my family?.
If we had noticed, in the former way of expressing,
love comes first, the action just follows. In a sense, the action is just a passive one. In the latter, the importance is given to the justification or proving of the actions. It is like saying, because I came out of the back door, I came in through the front door. Well, who knows?
So, in the right attitude of saying or holding on to these aspects of life, besides the fact that the life and vigor of any good action shall be and is love, such action is also just a manifestation or side effect or consequence or the aftermath of the love (love of God).
Outside the context of love, the material perception of the associated things - like what, where, when and how - of the actions themselves do not primarily and independently matter at all. It is the love, which triggered and sustained the action, that matters all along. Also such an action, irrespective of what it is, has love as its source, life, vigor and purpose. So without this love, any action is of no worth or meaning. [
Refer 1 Cor. 13] So, any loveless action can actually be said to be a dead or an untrue one.
If a lover brings a gift to his or her beloved, the gift
gets it worth or value only because of the lover, or precisely because of the love that the lover has. If the gift itself was sitting on the roadside for anyone to freely claim somewhere else, would it matter anything to the beloved at all, as opposed to the case of lover him or herself offering it to the beloved?
The degree of love in any action determines the degree of truth and eternal value to it. And the love we are talking about is the love of God.
Can we classify love and say one is pure or impure, good or bad, or even true or fake, etc?
Love is love. By Love, we are simply referring to the love which is eternal in its source and life. It is to be reminded that God is the source of all that is good, and so is the only source of love.
Which love do you think will have truth or eternal value in it? Is it the kind where people say I love this candy, that movie, etc? Or is it the Love of God, which offered up His only begotten Son as a sacrifice to save His beloved people?
In this world, every individual has their own understanding and notion of love. Also, all the words in this world evolves in some sense.
If one does not try to get the true meaning of love, with respect to its origin, then that person simply does not get the meaning of love. However, does it matter at all? If it matters, to whom does it matter? If one really cares, he or she will be blessed to strive to get his or her love straightened by asking the true source. In another perspective, to put it in plain words, there is nothing to be straightened in our understanding, it is the Love of God which is the (true) Love. Every other love, even if one claims to be love, are not love at all. They are false or shadow loves.
The love we are talking about is - the love of God. Again, we are not (the source, life and sustenance of) love. God is love.
In other words,
the closest realization of true love is in the degree of our realization of the love of God.
Suppose, as an extreme example, if one loves to simply hate or hurt others, and if they claim that as love, then this is not the love that we are talking about.
However, whatever the love is with any one, it is hard to make a stand or judge it at any point of time. It has to be personally meditated by every individual soul. Our individual soul better ask its Creator, the God Almighty, for what Love truly is.
There is no doubt its creator will answer in a special manner to make the soul understand correctly. You see, the answer would be best customized to fulfill our doubts. If we talk to God, it is like we have a personal and best teacher. This teacher, and no one else, knows exactly what we need.
For meditation purpose, we can refer to the Bible verses of
1 Corinthians, chapter 13, verses 4 through 8. There are many complete separate books written just discoursing these few verses of this chapter.
God is love. Can we give a finite definition for God, like we were able to do for a grain or a paper or any other object? See, these grain or paper came into existence in the realm of our known physical existence and limited nature. So the definitions, to the most extent, obey our domain that we have been blessed to define. Since God is Love, love too cannot be defined in a general sense, in a manner to be literally applied to all practical situations.
The love that we (can) hold can be true as much as we are blessed to be the temple of God or as much as we are blessed to be the fruitful branches of the vine of Christ. [Refer:
John 14:23,
1 Cor. 6:19,
John 15:5]
Wouldn't one be fooled if one is to expect (our understanding and knowledge of) God, and who He is, to obey generally this physical domain and law, which we ourselves created, despite being allowed thus by God?
So, again, can we define love with finite terms?
Our actions cannot be truly used by us to justify our love. If at all we have to talk about justification, then it can be said the other way around, that too with some reservations: our love may justify our actions.
God is the only true judge. Because God is the only one who knows the truths of our hearts and their intentions. God is love, and no where it says I am love or you are love or humans are love.
We could be love as much as we are of God. God only can judge our actions. God only knows the "love" worth of our actions. In a way, our love, that is the soul of our actions, justifies our actions. Also
all good things come from God and not from us. God, being the only and original source of Love, can only be the true and correct judge.
Such Love cannot be aware of the rewards if any. Even if it knows, it would not care much to claim its reward, unless claiming itself pleases the beloved. Because, in truth, it does not know anything about the rewards and all.
All Love cares is to please its Beloved. For this aspect, think of a mother's love, especially mothers of previous generations. Mother is the only person our God takes on to illustrate to us about His - everlasting and never forgetting - love [
Isiah 49:15].
I would like to bring the following Bible verses from Chapter 25, Mathew:
[31] And when the Son of man shall come in his majesty, and all the angels with him, then shall he sit upon the seat of his majesty. [32] And all nations shall be gathered together before him, and he shall separate them one from another, as the shepherd separateth the sheep from the goats: [33] And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on his left. [34] Then shall the king say to them that shall be on his right hand: Come, ye blessed of my Father, possess you the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. [35] For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and you took me in: [36] Naked, and you covered me: sick, and you visited me: I was in prison, and you came to me. [37] Then shall the just answer him, saying: Lord, when did we see thee hungry, and fed thee; thirsty, and gave thee drink? [38] And when did we see thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and covered thee? [39] Or when did we see thee sick or in prison, and came to thee?
Here, we can clearly see that the people of goodness were not even aware of what and when they were doing things to God.
Won't people, who do for rewards and for appreciation, certainly have some account on how much they have done, to whom they have done, under what circumstances they have done, when they have done, etc? But these people rather are in a surprise for what they did. However, do not forget to note that the other kind of people are in a surprise (or shock) for what they did not do.
Can't we then say that the people of goodness were so much immersed (intoxicated) in and acted in love that they know not anything else but love? Their hearts are filled with nothing but the love of God. They had no, or to be precise they could not have any, knowledge of anything else. The material attributes of what, when, to whom (that is by race, sex or status) in any situation might not have had any focus or impact in their love life. They simply were filled with and acted in love. Their knowledge is just love.
If the knowledge of our charity or love, gives us pride or status or hunger for reward or justification, then can we not say that we preferred these things to love? If we think we loved for reward, then it is not the love that we are talking about.
May be rewards are one of the means to feel the love. However, if a man gives a rose to a woman in his love, then the woman, despite feeling his love through the rose, would not care much about the rose, rather she would just cherish his love and be immersed in his love. Rewards may be are reminders that one could feel, or may be to fill our physical limitation of sight, or may be to lift us up occasionally. Rewards in this world are special. As we have never heard of a husband who gets a rose or a golden ring for his wife every day.
So, let us not look for or set our eyes on the reward, because no true beloved does it. Let us just see how much loving the lover is. If we have trouble doing this, let us then beseech our Lord to help us.
In Mathew 6:3, our Lord asks us the following:
But when thou dost alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth.
The easiest and the best known way, to conform to this alms giving nature or behavior, is simply through love. When one loves, they do not put their mind into the reward or any material aspects of the act, they simply do in order to please the beloved. Is not all they care about pleasing the beloved?
Also in Luke 21:1-3, we see our Lord speaking this:
[1] And looking on, he saw the rich men cast their gifts into the treasury. [2] And he saw also a certain poor widow casting in two brass mites. [3] And he said: Verily I say to you, that this poor widow hath cast in more than they all: [4] For all these have of their abundance cast into the offerings of God: but she of her want, hath cast in all the living that she had.
What else, other than the Love of God, or in other words one could say the trusting relationship, can be attributed as the more appropriate cause in this situation that made her to act thus in sacrifice? Love of God makes us blind to this material world and only see about loving a so good and sweet God. Love of God voids (or completely masks) the material value of anything of this world in its sight. So it lets us sacrifice.
Isn't this the reason why our Lord always start - His such sentences - with the words: "if you love", instead of starting with the words: "if you do these things"? Taking this verse for example:
If you love me, keep my commandments - John 14:15. So, isn't love that comes or starts out first?
I would like to share the words of some saints here.
Now a man cannot love his neighbor in God, except (i.e. without) he love God Himself; for that reason we must love God first, in order to love our neighbors in Him – St Bernard of Claivaux
It is because we love God, we end up loving our neighbors without being aware of it.
Little things done out of love are those that charm the Heart of
Christ… On the contrary, the most brilliant deeds, when done without
love, are but nothingness - St. Therese of Lisieux
Does not this convey that - it is not the size or smartness or even the knowledge of the deed that matters, rather it is love.
So if we wish to care or be concerned on anything about in this world, let us get concerned about Loving our God.
Conclusive thoughts
As far as I am blessed to understand and love to communicate to you, God would like to be personal to you. Already
God is in us.
God is near (in our hearts) to be found.
God's presence is everywhere. Because life, its
existence and sustenance are possible and comes from Him.
The degree of our desire on Him, the degree of our love on Him and the degree of our yielding to Him determines the degree of our relationship with and realization of Him. This is the reason some say that: God could be or could live in us. In this statement, it is our own blindness that enables us to use the word "could be" on (the omnipotent & omnipresence) God. The blame for the "could be" has to be on ourselves and not on God. So, the same statement can be worded like the following: We could see the God who is already in us. Without realizing His presence and His love, it will be very difficult to happily yield to His will.
As far as (you and me being) an individual, I believe, God does not want to be a force or a karma or an independent supernatural being or some independent superman or something like that.
By giving His (only) son as a sacrifice for our sins, it cannot be any more clear that He is in a loving relationship with us.
God is Love. Whoever loves God will yield his or her body and soul to be
His living temple or abode.
Why don't you try? In the past, haven't you tried so many things that are of no or little value?
For one moment, let us just believe. Let us forget who we are. Let us at least pretend to believe, what my heart is blessed to recommend now to us. My recommendation for you and me is to talk to and ask God about what is love and about how to love.
I am blessed to guarantee to my death that we would not be fooled. My surety does not come from (just) me as I am in person. I am blessed to strongly believe, to my ability, that the life of my surety comes from God.
You might even be thinking or asking this question: how one can ask and talk to God, whom one do not see or whom one do not believe in or any other doubt raising questions?
Again, dear brother, you have tried so many things from what has been recommended or mentioned to you through so many people.
Why don't you try this recommendation?
How shall I ask or converse with God?
The answer is just very very simple. The answer may sound ironical but very true, unless you doubt the meaning of the word "true". That is, we can ask God Himself to learn how to ask or how to start to converse with Him.
If you do not like the above fruitful answer, you can read the following: Since we do not know who God is, and since God, being the Almighty, ought to know our status better than any being on this existence, you just ask in the manner in which you know to ask. One thing my poor heart is blessed to be sure of, than being sure of anything else in this world that I know of, is that if one "sincerely" asks God of something, it does not matter which thing, they get the answer and feel the connection with the eternal God without fail, if the word "fail" has a meaning to it. Anything can be asked, like "Who I am?", or "What is Love?", "Can You help me understand You?" or "Can You have a relationship with me and teach me how?", etc?
Can you (dare to) talk to and have relationship with God?
Do you have courage to offer your freewill towards having a loving relationship with God?
Good wishes to you.
I kindly request you to offer a short prayer for me.
Praise be to God